ADDENDUM TO 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00720 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) for the period ending 
13 Oct 05 be voided and removed from his records – reconsideration request. 

 

2. His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) for the period ending 30 
Jun 06 be voided and removed from his records – new request. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

RESUME OF CASE: 

 

The applicant filed a complaint with the Air Mobility Command 
Inspector General (AMC/IG) alleging that his promotion was 
withheld in reprisal for a protected communication and he was 
rendered a referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR). The 
62 AW/IG concluded there was insufficient justification to 
conduct an investigation and recommended the applicant’s 
allegations be dismissed. Additionally, both AMC/IGQ and SAF/IGQ 
reviewed the report and concurred that the allegations should be 
dismissed. The applicant also filed a complaint with the Equal 
Employment Opportunity (EEO) office; however, his case was 
dismissed. 

 

He filed an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board 
(ERAB); however, the ERAB was not convinced the original report 
was unjust or wrong and denied his request. 

 

On 2 Feb 11, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s 
request to void his 2005 EPR, reinstate his line number, award 
him the AFCM, and fly a flag for his service. A complete copy of 
the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit H (w/atchs, 
excluding F and G). 

 

By letter, dated 7 Jul 12, the applicant requests reconsideration 
of his request to have his 2005 EPR removed or voided from his 
record and provided additional evidence. Additionally, he 
requests his 2006 EPR be removed or voided from his record. The 
applicant states that it is the “smoking gun” in his case and it 
proves that something was not accurate when the Air Force 
processed his EPR because non-concurrences of EPRs rarely happen. 


It happened in his case because he voiced his concerns to the IG 
office, EEO office, and his Congressman when he asked for 
assistance. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit I. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant corrective action. After 
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in 
support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not 
believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in the 
previous Board decision. With regard to the applicant’s request 
to remove the 2006 EPR, the applicant has not provided evidence 
that the contested report is erroneous, unjust or that it does 
not reflect an accurate depiction of his performance during the 
rating period in question. Therefore, in view of the above and 
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon 
which to recommend favorable consideration of the applicant’s 
request. 

 

2. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented 
did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; 
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; 
and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board reconsidered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-00720 in Executive Session on 4 Apr 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following additional documentary evidence for Docket Number 
BC-2011-00720 was considered: 

 


 Exhibit H. Record of Proceedings, dated 8 Mar 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit I. Letter, Applicant, dated 7 Jul 12, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair